reklama

Illusory science about the causes of global warming

The findings, which should appear in the fifth Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is published this week, say with 95% certainty that the cause of rising average temperatures since 1975 is caused by man. It seems that this report does not help politicians nor the public in deciding how to deal further with the protection against climate change. Why? Because scientists, instead of searching for a clear physical explanation why extreme changes in weather appear with slower growth in average temperature, look for support in climatic anomalies and also a kind of heat storage in the oceans.

Písmo: A- | A+
Diskusia  (0)

To evaluate the rate of climate change on the basis of a comparison of average temperatures is a scientific howler. Current temperatures throughout the year can change more dramatic, while the average temperature can remain unchanged. How is this possible? Well just as is true in mathematics that "20 minus 20 = 0" and " 30 minus 30 " is also ZERO! Let those numbers be temperature and we get a temperature without change. Difference in summer and winter temperatures can be much greater than ever before, and the average temperature may remain at the initial level and create the illusion that the climate does not change. If this argument will be really published in the report, it allows the climate scepctics and politicians to live under the illusion that everything is fine and nothing should be done. That's it! Problem of climate change is finally solved!

SkryťVypnúť reklamu
Článok pokračuje pod video reklamou


It seems that science has been caught into its own trap and ceases to be credible on climate change. Why? Well simply because the cause more frequent extremes of weather, can not be caused by increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere because it does not fit into physics. IN physics it is true that more ppm of any origin in the atmosphere, shoulc decrease temperature fluctuations, regardless of whether the average temperature is rising, falling or stagnating. And it is exactly the opposite. Climatologists will have to explain this much more under public pressure, than just slowing growth in average temperature.

Michal Kravčík

Michal Kravčík

Bloger 
  • Počet článkov:  633
  •  | 
  • Páči sa:  5x

Presadzujem a podporujem agendu „VODA PRE OZDRAVENIE KLÍMY“. Jej cieľom je posilnenie environmentálnej bezpečnosti prostredníctvom zodpovedného prístupu v ochrane prírodného a teda i kultúrneho dedičstva. Napĺňanie agendy, založenej na prijatí novej, vyššej kultúry vo vzťahu k vode, môže na Slovensku vytvoriť viac ako 100 tisíc a v Európe vyše 5 miliónov pracovných príležitostí. Zoznam autorových rubrík:  PovodneHladujúci potrebujú voduKlimatická zmenaVODA zrkadlo kultúryhttp://s07.flagcounter.com/morNová vodná paradigmaKošiceSpoločnosťhttp://moje.hnonline.sk/blog/4

Prémioví blogeri

Zmudri.sk

Zmudri.sk

3 články
Pavol Koprda

Pavol Koprda

10 článkov
Martina Hilbertová

Martina Hilbertová

49 článkov
Karolína Farská

Karolína Farská

4 články
Yevhen Hessen

Yevhen Hessen

20 článkov
reklama
reklama
SkryťZatvoriť reklamu