To evaluate the rate of climate change on the basis of a comparison of average temperatures is a scientific howler. Current temperatures throughout the year can change more dramatic, while the average temperature can remain unchanged. How is this possible? Well just as is true in mathematics that "20 minus 20 = 0" and " 30 minus 30 " is also ZERO! Let those numbers be temperature and we get a temperature without change. Difference in summer and winter temperatures can be much greater than ever before, and the average temperature may remain at the initial level and create the illusion that the climate does not change. If this argument will be really published in the report, it allows the climate scepctics and politicians to live under the illusion that everything is fine and nothing should be done. That's it! Problem of climate change is finally solved!
It seems that science has been caught into its own trap and ceases to be credible on climate change. Why? Well simply because the cause more frequent extremes of weather, can not be caused by increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere because it does not fit into physics. IN physics it is true that more ppm of any origin in the atmosphere, shoulc decrease temperature fluctuations, regardless of whether the average temperature is rising, falling or stagnating. And it is exactly the opposite. Climatologists will have to explain this much more under public pressure, than just slowing growth in average temperature.